Compare And Contrast Plato With Machiavelli On The Relationship Between The Ethics Of The Soul And The Ethics Of Politics Using `the Prince` And `the Trial And Death Of Socrates`

Politics is the art of ruling for the benefit of the people . It implies author and power needs to find al mavenification and arguments to support it This is why on that point has ever been a connexion between organisation and the principles of clean philosophy , no look if the latter ones back up the occasion or if they stood in contradiction with it . This concentrates on the kind between the ethics of soul and that of politics in the workings of Machiavelli , The Prince and Plato s The exertion and death of Socrates . The similarities and the differences between the conceptions of the two authors argon revealed with an knowledge psychology of the concept of virtue and its connection to the undivided s triumph and the surface being of the submit in the works that were mentioned aboveBoth Plato and Machiave lli are concerned with the s dear being of the cite and the relationship between the differentiate and the man-to-man . The conception regarding the status of the individual is nevertheless distinct in their works . While Plato tries to elicit that it is always break to be incisively than unjust , claiming that there is a ironlike connection between justice , own(prenominal) happiness and the well being of the state , Machiavelli underlines the f set that moral principles are non necessarily connected with the efficiency of the act of ruling . If the principles of piety and justice need to be lowly in for the state to be prosperous , than this is how things must be done . The lowest inclination becomes an excuse for the means that are required in the process .

This is in fact the plight that is to be shew in The Prince : how is one supposed to withdraw justice and morality when a just and moral purpose is to be served through immoral and unjust meansOn the other pay , Plato establishes a connection between the state and the soul of the individual , considering justice as a virtue that is to be arrange in some(prenominal) these dimensions . The dilemma that occurs in The trail and death of Socrates is proving that it is always , disregarding of the circumstances , better to act in a just manner . The decision of Socrates to obey the jurisprudence , so far if that meant last , is a strong illustration of the conception regarding the honor for the righteousness and what is just . Both Plato and Machiavelli consider that the individuals need the state as a form of organization that is indispensable for their survival and well beingAccording to Plato , the city (the state ) includes the individuals . Thus a just city automatically means happy individuals . Every citizen , no matter his status must respect the law . qualifying against the law means doing wrong to the city and thus to its citizens . Socrates believes that the virtually worthful possession of an individual is not a actual one , but his own soul Wealth does not stick about excellence , but excellence makes wealthiness and everything else good for men , both individually and collectively (Plato , 33...If you pauperization to vanquish a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay